Skip to content
  1. Root/
  2. GLOSSARY/
  3. INNOVATORS DILEMMA
Back to the glossary

Innovator's dilemma

The innovator's dilemma is the trap in which well-run firms lose to disruptive entrants precisely because they listen to their best customers.

The innovator's dilemma is the unsettling discovery that doing everything right can be exactly what kills a company.

The innovator's dilemma, named by Clayton Christensen, is the trap in which well-managed, successful firms lose their leadership to disruptive entrants precisely because they follow sound management practice: listening to their best customers and investing in their most profitable lines.

The logic that leads good firms astray

Disruptive technologies usually arrive worse on the measures established customers care about, and cheaper or simpler. A good firm, consulting its best customers and protecting its margins, rationally declines to pursue them; the market looks small, the margins thin, the customers uninterested. Each decision is locally correct. Together they steer the firm away from the very technology that will later overtake it. The dilemma is that the textbook-correct response is the fatal one.

Why resources do not save them

It is tempting to think a large, capable incumbent could simply choose to invest in the threat. In practice its resource-allocation process fights back. Capital and talent flow toward the projects with the biggest, most certain returns, which are always the established ones. The disruptive line cannot win that internal competition while it is still small, so it is starved until the moment it is large enough to matter, by which point an entrant owns it.

The escape route

Christensen's prescription is structural: pursue the disruptive opportunity in a separate organisation, small enough to be excited by a small market, free from the parent's customers and cost expectations, and allowed to fail and learn. Trying to nurture disruption inside the mainstream business, judged by mainstream metrics, almost always smothers it.

The dilemma endures because its cause is not incompetence but competence misapplied. That is what makes it dangerous: the warning signs look like good performance, and the firm is usually congratulating itself right up to the point the ground gives way.